Good vs Evil: Good Samaritan Teens / Teen Rapists

Good vs Evil: What prevails more in our society? Good or Evil? We leave the choice to you to evaluate the society you belong to. However in this new section ‘Good vs Evil’ we bring out the two extremes of the social incidents. The good one which sets an example and ensure we raise our kids like them. And the evil one which makes us aware and ensure we raise our kids unlike them and enable them to protect themselves from such evils.

The Good: Good Samaritan Teens

Tarbett (17),  Bailey Campbell (17) and Aeron McQuillin (18)

The three teenagers from Ontario, Canada, went for a drive and spotted a stranger’s broken car. She was struggling with no help at the highway, who can’t afford to tow the vehicle. The boys decided to help her by pushing her car till her home. Interestingly, her home is not at the next street, but 7 miles far. But the good Samaritans did it. (Read the full story here)

The Evil : Teen Rapists

In India, rape has become a routine crime and going on like it has no full stop. According to a report about 1,752 rape incidents are reported every year in the Indian state of Odisha, alone. But it saddens us, when the crime is committed by teenagers whom we can still call as boys next door.  A college student was allegedly gang-raped in Odisha’s Sundargarh by five youth, including three of her classmates, who dragged her into a forest on her way back to home after college. (Read the full story here)

Bottom line: Every kid is born with a blank soul, it is us the society and the parents who script their character. Teach them Good and make them practice it. Make them aware of the Evil and help them fight it.

 

Comment your thoughts… Ideas to bring up good character in kids.

News Courtesy: CBC.ca and News 18 India

Documentary : Know : Canada

Canada is a country in the northern part of North America. Its ten provinces and three territories extend from the Atlantic to the Pacific and northward into the Arctic Ocean, covering 9.98 million square kilometres (3.85 million square miles), making it the world’s second-largest country by total area. Canada’s southern border with the United States, stretching some 8,891 kilometres (5,525 mi), is the world’s longest bi-national land border. Its capital is Ottawa, and its three largest metropolitan areas are Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. As a whole, Canada is sparsely populated, the majority of its land area being dominated by forest and tundra. Consequently, its population is highly urbanized, with over 80 percent of its inhabitants concentrated in large and medium-sized cities, with 70% of citizens residing within 100 kilometres (62 mi) of the southern border. Canada’s climate varies widely across its vast area, ranging from arctic weather in the north, to hot summers in the southern regions, with four distinct seasons.

Know : Top 60 Green Economy Countries

This 4th edition of the GGEI is an in-depth look at how 60 countries perform in the global green economy, as well as how expert practitioners rank this performance and ranks based on perception.

Performance Rank		SCORE
1	Sweden	68.1
2	Norway	65.9
3	Costa Rica	64.2
4	Germany	63.6
5	Denmark	63.2
6	Switzerland	63.1
7	Austria	63
8	Finland	62.9
9	Iceland	62.6
10	Spain	59.2
11	Ireland	59
12	New Zealand	58.8
13	France	56.4
14	Colombia	56.1
15	Portugal	55.8
16	Peru	55.8
17	Kenya	55.4
18	Brazil	55.3
19	Chile	55.1
20	United Kingdom	54.6
21	Netherlands	54.2
22	Uruguay	54.1
23	Mauritius	51.5
24	Zambia	51.3
25	Italy	51.2
26	Ethiopia	50.6
27	Rwanda	50.4
28	United States	50.1
29	Canada	49.6
30	Taiwan	47.5
31	Mexico	47.4
32	Philippines	47.2
33	Israel	47
34	South Africa	46.8
35	Malaysia	46.4
36	Tanzania	46.2
37	Australia	46.1
38	Czech Republic	46
39	South Korea	45.6
40	United Arab Emirates	45.6
41	Burkina Faso	45.2
42	Cambodia	44.9
43	Turkey	44.8
44	Japan	44.6
45	Thailand	44.5
46	Ghana	44.5
47	Belgium	44.1
48	Argentina	43.8
49	India	43.4
50	Slovakia	43
51	Panama	41.5
52	Morocco	41.5
53	Mozambique	41
54	Indonesia	40.3
55	China	40.1
56	Poland	37.1
57	Senegal	33.4
58	Qatar	33.3
59	Vietnam	32.2
60	Mongolia	29.5

The perception survey for the 2014 GGEI was conducted from June through August 2014, and polled targeted respondents on how they assessed national green performance on the four main dimensions of Leadership & Climate Change, Efficiency Sectors, Markets & Investment, and Environment & Natural Capital.

Perception Rank		SCORE
1	Germany	93.6
2	Denmark	92.8
3	Sweden	90.2
4	Norway	84.8
5	Netherlands	84
6	United States	76.2
7	Japan	72.4
8	United Kingdom	71.6
9	Finland	70.2
10	Switzerland	67.8
11	Australia	66.3
12	Canada	63
13	China	61.6
14	Costa Rica	60.4
15	Brazil	59.7
16	India	56.1
17	Austria	55.1
18	New Zealand	52
19	Iceland	49.1
20	France	48.5
21	Spain	46.7
22	South Africa	45.8
23	South Korea	44.1
24	Israel	41.1
25	United Arab Emirates	40.3
26	Kenya	40
27	Malaysia	39.3
28	Mexico	37.1
29	Italy	36.1
30	Belgium	36
31	Indonesia	35.3
32	Peru	35
33	Ireland	34.3
34	Mauritius	34
35	Chile	33.5
36	Tanzania	33.3
37	Ethiopia	33.1
38	Philippines	33
39	Morocco	32.6
40	Portugal	32.5
41	Colombia	31.6
42	Poland	31.5
43	Qatar	31.2
44	Turkey	31.2
45	Vietnam	31.1
46	Taiwan	30.7
47	Argentina	30.2
48	Rwanda	30.1
49	Zambia	30
50	Mozambique	29.8
51	Thailand	29.3
52	Czech Republic	29.2
53	Cambodia	28.9
54	Ghana	28.7
55	Burkina Faso	28.5
56	Slovakia	28.2
57	Mongolia	27.7
58	Uruguay	27.6
59	Panama	27.4
60	Senegal	27.3

Germany (perception) and Sweden (performance) top the 2014 GGEI, confirming a trend observed in prior editions of strong results by Germany and the Nordic states. Besides performing well on both the economic and environmental areas of the GGEI, these nations display consistent green leadership and receive global recognition for it.

Covered for the first time in this edition, Costa Rica performs extremely well, ranking third on the GGEI performance measure behind Sweden and Norway and receiving strong recognition on the perception survey, an impressive result for such a small country.

Like in 2012, Copenhagen is the top green city as ranked by our survey of global experts, reinforcing the continued strength of the Danish green brand. Tracked for the first time this year, Vancouver and Singapore also rank in the top 10 of green cities.

Many of the fastest growing economies in the world rank poorly on the GGEI performance measure, highlighting an urgent need to reorient their economies to greener

growth pathways. Regionally, these countries are mostly in Africa (Ghana), the Gulf (Qatar, United Arab Emirates), and Asia (Cambodia, China, Thailand, Vietnam)

There are concerning results related to more developed countries as well – notably Australia, Japan, the Netherlands and the United States – where perceptions of their green economic performance dramatically exceed their actual performance on the GGEI. These countries appear to receive more credit than they deserve, an information gap that requires further exploration.

Despite its leadership founding the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI), South Korea continues not to register as a green country brand on our survey and performs poorly, ranked 39th out of 60 on this year’s GGEI. Despite better perception results, Japan also performs poorly on the 2014 GGEI, ranked 44th out of 60.

While the United Kingdom performs adequately in most areas of the GGEI, it doesn’t excel on any one topic, possibly due to inconsistent political rhetoric and policy related to green economy there. While gradually improving in each successive GGEI edition, the UK still lags behind its northern European and Nordic competitors.

Five European nations – Austria, Iceland, Ireland, Portugal and Spain – reveal performance scores that exceed their perception ones significantly – signaling an urgent need for better strategic communications and information exchange of their green merits and associated investment opportunities.

The GGEI results reveal a similar observation for a variety of non-European states – including Ethiopia, Mauritius, Rwanda in Africa and Colombia, Chile and Peru in Latin America – again suggesting a need for these states to better position their green economies on the international stage.

---

Courtesy and Source : GGEI-Report 2014 by DUAL CITIZEN LLC

Disclaimer: All the rights of the data and the study belong to DUAL CITIZEN LLC. We have shared the info here for educational purposes only. We do not own any info above or the rights.

---

Know : List of Countries using Nuclear Energy

Nuclear power stations operate in 31 countries. Of the thirty countries in which nuclear power plants operate, only France, Belgium, Hungary and Slovakia use them as the primary source of electricity, although many other countries have a significant nuclear power generation capacity. According to the World Nuclear Association, a nuclear power advocacy group, over 45 countries are giving “serious consideration” to introducing a nuclear power capability, with Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey,Vietnam, Belarus, and Jordan at the forefront. China, South Korea and India are pursuing ambitious expansions of their nuclear power capacities

As of June 2011, Germany and Switzerland are phasing-out nuclear power which will be replaced mostly by fossil fuels, and a smaller part renewable energy.

Rank	Country	Capacity (MW) (2014)	Nuclear share of electricity production, 2013
1	United States	99,081	19.4%
2	France	63,130	73.3%
3	Japan	42,388	1.7%
4	Russia	23,643	17.5%
5	South Korea	20,721	27.6%
6	China	17,978	2.1%
7	Canada	13,538	16.0%
8	Ukraine	13,107	43.6%
9	Germany	12,068	15.4%
10	Sweden	9,474	42.7%
11	United Kingdom	9,243	18.3%
12	Spain	7,121	19.7%
13	Belgium	5,927	52.1%
14	India	5,308	3.5%
15	Taiwan	5,032	19.1%
16	Czech Republic	3,884	35.9%
17	Switzerland	3,308	36.4%
18	Finland	2,752	33.3%
19	Bulgaria	1,906	30.7%
20	Hungary	1,889	50.7%
21	Brazil	1,884	2.8%
22	South Africa	1,860	5.7%
23	Slovakia	1,815	51.7%
24	Argentina	1,627	4.4%
25	Mexico	1,570	4.6%
26	Romania	1,300	19.8%
27	Iran	915	1.5%
28	Pakistan	690	4.4%
29	Slovenia	688	33.6%
30	Netherlands	482	2.8%
31	Armenia	375	29.2%
	World	374,704

---

Courtesy & Source: “Nuclear power station” by Ichabod Paleogene, Krzysztof Kori. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Eco Preservation : The Spotted Lake, Kliluk

Spotted Lake is a saline endorheic alkali lake located northwest of Osoyoos in the eastern Similkameen Valley of British Columbia, Canada.

Spotted Lake is richly concentrated with various minerals. It contains dense deposits of magnesium sulfate, calcium and sodium sulphates. It also contains high concentrations of eight other minerals and lower amounts of silver and titanium.

Most of the water in the lake evaporates over the summer, revealing colorful mineral deposits. Large “spots” on the lake appear and are colored according to the mineral composition and seasonal amount of precipitation. Magnesium sulfate, which crystallizes in the summer, is a major contributor to spot color. In the summer, remaining minerals in the lake harden to form natural “walkways” around and between the spots.

Originally known to the First Nations of the Okanagan Valley as Kliluk, Spotted Lake was for centuries and remains revered as a sacred site thought to provide therapeutic waters. During World War I, the minerals of Spotted Lake were used in manufacturing ammunition.

Later, the area came under the control of the Ernest Smith Family for a term of about 40 years. In 1979, Smith attempted to create interest in a spa at the lake. The First Nations responded with an effort to buy the lake, then in October 2001, struck a deal by purchasing 22 hectares of land for a total of $720,000, and contributed about 20% of the cost. The Indian Affairs Department paid the remainder.

Today, there is a roadside sign telling visitors about the lake’s mythical healing powers. Despite a fence protecting the lake shore from the liabilities of public access, the lake can be easily seen and many visitors stop to view the site.

---

Courtesy & Source : Wikipedia

---